Legal Opinion

Kindler v. Kindler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff brought this action in New York seeking enforcement of so much of an Oklahoma divorce decree as purported to grant her title to real property located in New York owned by the parties prior to the divorce as tenants by the entirety. In his answer to the complaint and his affidavit in response to *754plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, defendant claimed that the Oklahoma decree could not be effective to vest title in the plaintiff, and that, therefore, plaintiff had no legal basis for compelling conveyance of the property.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Stelz v. . ShreckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Tiedemann v. TiedemannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. Tiedemann v. . TiedemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Miller v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API