Legal Opinion

Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. Brass

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1915No. 7188PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Hill County; Horton B. Porter, Judge. Action by Franz Brass against the Texar-kana & Ft. Smith Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

Heretofore, upon objections by appellee to the sufficiency of the record, we affirmed this case without considering the assignments of error; our action being based upon the failure of appellant to bring into review by sufficient bill of exception the action of the trial court in refusing to give a peremptory instruction directing verdict for appellant and in giving such instruction in favor of appellee. We refused to consider the assignments on the ground: (1) That the bill of exceptions preserving the objections of appellant to the action of the court as stated did not comply with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. WadsackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. China Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. W. R. Case & Sons Cutlery Co. v. FolsomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Texas Midland R. R. v. FoglemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brass v. Texarkana & Ft. Smith Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CulwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. CulbersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Stephenson v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Tomson v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API