Legal Opinion

Root v. New Liberty Hospital District

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 6, 2000No. 99-2988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Benjamin, Amy, and Elizabeth Root claimed that Liberty Hospital violated the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), see 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, when it discharged Amy Root, then pregnant with Elizabeth, without properly performing the medical screening and stabilization that the statute requires. See 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(a), § 1395dd(b), § 1395dd(c). The Roots sued the hospital, asking for “those damages available for personal injury under the law of the State in which the hospital is located.” See 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(d)(2)(A).

Under current…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Winifred Hardy v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. And Queens Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Musick, Peeler & Garrett v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benjamin Root and Amy Root, Individually and as Co-Next Friends of Elizabeth Root, and Elizabeth Root, a Minor v. New Liberty Hospital District, D/B/A Liberty Hospital, Missouri Hospital Association, Amicus Curiae on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API