Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 1985No. 1572PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This is a tax sale redemption case. Appeal is taken from the lower court’s order making appellant’s petition to redeem absolute upon payment to appellees, who had purchased the property at Sheriff’s Sale, of their expenses totaling $30,878.10 plus interest. The crux of appellant’s argument is that the lower court erred in finding that approximately $21,000.00 worth of expenses incurred by appellee in renovating and insuring the property constituted necessary expenses within the meaning of the redemption statute, 53 P.S. § 7293.

The record discloses the following pertinent facts.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Philadelphia v. RutherfurdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. King Kai ChinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. First Union National Bank v. Diamonds & Gold Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Chicken's Place, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. City of Philadelphia ex rel. Philadelphia Housing Development Corp. v. NovickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Rukuson v. DantzlerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API