Legal Opinion

Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 29, 2013No. Civil No. 10-241-GFVTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.

In November of 2007, Thomas W. Hill and Tiffany Farmer were involved in an automobile accident on Kentucky Highway 3041 in Knox County, Kentucky. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company insures both. State Farm and Hill agree that the insurance policy puts a time limit on bringing certain legal claims. Since that time expired before the Complaint was filed in this case, State Farm believes that Summary Judgment is in order. It is correct, and for the reasons that follow, State Farm’s Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 31]…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
In Re: Marilyn E. Morris, Debtor. John Poss v. Marilyn E. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
Eileen A. Logan v. Denny's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
Sheila J. Bell v. Ohio State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Grubaugh v. USAA Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023