Legal Opinion

In re Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, Walter R. Bailey, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Depart*472ment on December 18, 1968. At all times relevant herein, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (the DDC) commenced an investigation of respondent after receiving a complaint against him from the managing partner of the law firm Rogers & Wells. Respondent had joined Rogers & Wells in 1971 as an associate, became a partner in 1977 and headed the firm’s trusts…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re KowaloffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re TaubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re FrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. In Re SaghirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. In Re Uzmah SaghirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. In re JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. In the Matter of David Wesler FrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API