Legal Opinion

In re Johnston

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 30, 2000No. S00A1352Published

1Per curiam

The Board of Bar Examiners ruled that Ann T. Johnston was not eligible to take the Attorneys’ Examination in Georgia because she had been the subject of professional discipline in the State of New York. The first issue on appeal is whether an attorney’s voluntary resignation from a state bar while disciplinary proceedings are pending is a “discipline.” Following the majority rule, we hold that a voluntary resignation in the face of a pending disciplinary proceeding in another state is a “lawyer discipline” under our state’s bar admissions rules. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the Board…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. In re JohnstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Atlanta Journal & Atlanta Constitution v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  4. In re C. R. W.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Matter of OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API