Shanehsaz v. Johnson
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
Mark J. Dinsmore, United States Magistrate Judge
This matter comes before the Court at the intersection of the modem complexities of international relations and the “ancient civil remedy” of replevin.1 The dispositive issue in this case is this: does the federal regulation prohibiting investments in Iran preclude Plaintiffs action to recover the proceeds from such an investment? The Court concludes that Plaintiffs replevin and trespass claims seek an illegal remedy and thus fail as a matter of law. Accordingly, as expounded below, the- Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bonte v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- O'LEARY v. Accretive Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. SALIN BANK AND TRUST COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- LeSEA Inc v. LeSEA Broadcasting CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023