Legal Opinion
Cohan v. Elder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1940No. 9377PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, a creditor of appellees, petitioners under § 75, subs, a-r, of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, subs, a-r, for a loan to appellees secured by a trust deed of appellees’ citrus orchards,’ appeals from a decree of the district court of September 28, 1939. The decree modified and amended an extension plan of appellees and denied motions of appellant to dismiss the proceedings and to dissolve an order restraining a sale under the trust deed securing appellant’s loan.
A modified extension plan which was confirmed May 24, 1938, provided the court was to retain…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BartelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wilson v. Alliance Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cohan v. ElderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Bogart v. Miller Land & Livestock Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- In re HoagDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1945
- Bogart v. Miller Land & Livestock Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- In re WagnerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946