Visconti v. MEM MacHinery Corp.

7 N.J. Super. 271 (1950)

73 A.2d 74

ANTHONY J. VISCONTI, PLAINTIFF,

v.

M.E.M. MACHINERY CORP., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 17, 1950.

Decided April 26, 1950.

Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.

Mr. Allan L. Tumarkin, attorney for and of counsel pro se.

Mr. Ervan F. Kushner, attorney for and of counsel with defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DONGES, J.A.D.

The single point in contention is whether appellant, Allan L. Tumarkin, an attorney-at-law, has a lien on funds in his possession, for fees in the sum of $650 for professional services.