Legal Opinion
First National Bankv. North Jersey Trust Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 8, 1940PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Leyden, S. C. C.
The defendant moves to strike the several' counts of the complaint upon the ground that each is insufficient in law. This motion was denied on May 13th, 1940, upon the erroneous assumption that it was a general motion addressed to the complaint as a whole. Malone v. Brotherhood, &c., 94 N. J. L. 347; Van Schoick v. Van *450Schoick, 76 Id. 242. A re-argument was permitted on June 28th, 1940. Counts 1 and 3 are allegedly based upon the theory of the defendant’s breach of its guaranty of prior endorsements. Count 2 is upon the theory of conversion. Count 4 is a repetition of counts 1…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Passaic-Bergen Lumber Co. v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. Citizens National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
3Cited by27 opinions
- Brighton, Inc. v. Colonial First Nat'l BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. SnyderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- The FIRST NAT'L. BANK OF BAY SHORE v. StamperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Pereira v. United Jersey Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Harry H. White Lumber Co. v. Crocker-Citizens National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.