Legal Opinion

Hackman v. Dandamudi

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1987No. 50457PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

Dr. Babu R. Dandamudi appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following a jury trial and verdict for both actual and punitive damages against him, and his co-defendant, Professional Care Centers, a corporation doing business as Oak Park Professional Care Nursing Home, hereinafter Oak Park, and in favor of the plaintiff, Alma Hack-man on a medical malpractice claim. We affirm.

The action was brought by Carolyn Hackman, plaintiff’s daughter, in her legal capacity as plaintiff’s guardian and conservator. During the pendency of this…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. General Motors Corp. v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ward v. OchoaSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Gatto v. Walgreen Drug Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carter v. Tom's Truck Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. King v. Copp Trucking, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Asbridge v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API