Legal Opinion

Georgos v. Jackson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 2002No. 45A03-0106-CV-216PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants/Cross-Defendants, Michael Georgos (Georgos) and Pangere Corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the Appellants"), appeal the trial court's grant of Appellee/Cross-Claimant's, Claude Jackson (Jackson), Motion for Relief from Judgment.

We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ISSUES

The Appellants raise four issues on appeal, one of which we find dispositive and restate as follows: whether the trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant Jackson's Motion for Relief from Judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Twyman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Browning v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Paulson v. Centier BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Trook v. Lafayette Bank and Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Chelovich v. Ruff & Silvian AgencyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Georgos v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Georgos v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API