Legal Opinion

Fackler v. Genetzky

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2002No. S-00-758PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Howard S. Fackler and Patricia A. Fackler sued Roger M. Genetzky, D.V.M., for alleged professional negligence that resulted in the deaths of two horses owned by the Facklers. In Fackler v. Genetzky, 257 Neb. 130, 595 N.W.2d 884 (1999), we reversed the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment on the professional negligence claims and remanded the cause for further proceedings. At the close of the Facklers’ evidence, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of Dr. Genetzky, and the Facklers appeal.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

The party against whom a verdict is directed is entitled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doe v. ZedekNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fackler v. GenetzkyNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Doe v. Gunny's Ltd. PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. V.C. v. CasadyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Rhodia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Sydow v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. KuehnNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pitts v. Genie Indus., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Loman v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API