Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Pruitt
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 8, 1949No. A-11209PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, P. J.
The petitioner, Odis Pruitt, an inmate of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary, alleges in his verified petition for habeas corpus that his commitment to the penitentiary is void for the reason that the judgment and sentence under which he is now serving recites that he was convicted of burglary in the second degree and sentenced to serve 10 years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary on account of such conviction; that the maximum period of imprisonment that may be assessed upon conviction of the crime of burglary in the second degree is a term of seven years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte GrantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Landon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Ex Parte HowlandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
- Ex Parte OwenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Beaird v. RameyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Johnson v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Randolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Ex Parte FaulkenberryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.