Legal Opinion

State v. Erickson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1916No. 2819PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. P. E. Erickson was convicted of practicing medicine with* out a license, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, C. J.

1 The defendant was convicted of practicing medicine without a license, and appeals. The information is that he did “willfully and unlawfully,” on a day and at a place specified, “practice medicine without holding a lawful certificate or license issued by the state board of medical examiners of the state of Utah, by then and there diagnosing, treating, operating upon, and adjusting for the physical ailments of one Thomas E. Browning for a fee of two dollars, then and there paid by the said Thomas E. Browning to, and received by,” the defendant. The offense is stated in the language of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Board of Medical Examiners v. FreenorUtah Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. McCornishUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. FiteIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. OlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Shober v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API