Legal Opinion

Bernard Asheim v. Pigeon Hole Parking, Inc., a Corporation Vaughn Sanders, Leo Sanders, and Lawrence L. McLean

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1960No. 16693_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOWEN, District Judge.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Northern Division, at Spokane, in an action by appellant against appellees for fraud and conspiracy based upon (1) allegedly untrue and fraudulent statements in a letter written to appellee Pigeon Hole Parking, Inc. (hereinafter Parking Co.) by its patent lawyer, Glen L. Fish, and by appellees furnished to appellant, relating to Parking Co.’s patent

“ * * * on a structure of tiered storage stalls positioned at one or both sides of an elevator capable of being operated both…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cheesman v. SathreWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Dobbin v. Pacific Coast Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Asheim v. Pigeon Hole Parking, Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API