Legal Opinion

(1999)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided May 24, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear William D. Missouri

You have requested our opinion whether a State's Attorney who is appointed by a judge to prosecute a contempt proceeding must obtain the approval of the judge before dismissing, or entering a nolleprosequi of, the contempt charge.

We conclude that a State's Attorney designated to prosecute a contempt charge retains the usual prosecutorial discretion to dismiss, or enter anolle prosequi of, a criminal charge without special court approval. The exercise of that discretion is subject to the constitutional and statutory limitations enforced by the courts with respect to any…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API