Legal Opinion

Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Dieter

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1966No. A-11569PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEAKLEY, Justice.

This is an agreed workmen’s compensation case submitted in accordance with Rule 262, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner is the compensation carrier; Respondent is the injured employee and claimant. The one question presented for decision is whether Petitioner, who had not invoked the provisions of Section 12e of Article 8306 1 , was entitled in the trial of the case to make proof of the possible bene ficial effects of pre-trial surgery voluntarily undertaken by Respondent at the hands of his personal physician. The agreed statement of facts submitted to the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Truck Insurance Exchange v. SeelbachTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. National Surety Corporation v. Mrs. Ollie Bellah, and Husband, W. F. BellahCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASS'N v. SheltonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. CourtneyTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Dieter v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Izaguirre v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  2. Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Texas General Indemnity Company v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Hotchkiss v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Bewley v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API