Legal Opinion

Loyal Protective Insurance v. Huffington

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 30, 1933No. 13,229PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as the company and defendant in error as Huffington.

Huffington held an accident policy in the company. Having sustained an injury, he- brought suit on the contract. On a trial to the court he had judgment for about $700. To review that judgment the company prosecutes this writ and asks that it be made a supersedeas.

The record raises but two questions which require consideration: (1) Was the accident within the terms of the policy? (2) Was recovery precluded by failure to furnish proof of loss within the ninety days fixed by the policy, or by suit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jennings v. Brotherhood Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. OfficerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. National Mutual Fire Insurance v. SpragueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Federal Life Insurance v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Life Insurance v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API