Legal Opinion

Federal Life Insurance v. Hall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 25, 1932No. 13,068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court and are hereinafter designated as there, or as Mrs. Hall and the company respectively. Mrs. Hall’s deceased husband is referred to as Hall.

Hall, who held an accident policy in the company, was killed by the collapse of a structure on which he was working*. Mrs. Hall broug’ht this suit on said policy. The cause was tried to the court by agreement, and to review a judgment thereon entered against it the.company prosecutes this writ and asks that it be made a supersedeas.

The policy in question provided for the payment of $1,000 to Mrs.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Accident Ass'n v. FrohardIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Queen Insurance Co. of Liverpool v. Hudnut Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Union Health & Accident Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ross v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. Loyal Protective Insurance v. HuffingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  3. Federal Life Insurance v. LortonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API