Legal Opinion

Friedlander v. PDK Labs, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 26, 1996No. 94-8299Published

1Per curiam

In our prior opinion in this case published as Friedlander v. PDK Labs, Inc., 59 F.3d 1131 (11th Cir.1995), we stated:

It is clear that a plaintiff may only bring an action under the FBPA against a defendant who engages in deceptive or unfair practices that have the potential to harm the general consuming public....

The Georgia Court of Appeals, however, has also stated that a plaintiff may only bring a lawsuit under the FBPA “in his capacity as an individual member of the consuming public who has suffered damage as the result of an unfair or deceptive act or practice which had or has potential…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zeeman v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. State v. Meredith Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Gross v. Ideal Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Friedlander v. PDK Labs, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Mitchell K. Friedlander v. Pdk, Labs, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API