Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Wheeler

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 21, 1935No. 6 Div. 849PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

“Every court has power — 1. To preserve and enforce order in its immediate presence. * * * 4. To control, in furtherance of justice, the conduct of its officers, and all other persons connected with a judicial proceeding before it, in every matter appertaining thereto.” Code, § 8576 (4631).

For the effectual exercise of the powers conferred by the above section, the court may punish for contempt. Code, § 8579 (4632).

The power to “inflict summary punishment for contempts” extends to “1. Disrespectful,' contemptuous, or insolent behavior in court, tending in anywise to diminish…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex parte DickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Ex parte HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Board of Revenue v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Ex Parte BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Easton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. City of Birmingham v. PerryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Ex Parte RegisterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Ex Parte BullenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Ex Parte MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API