In re Shields
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Four charges of professional misconduct are made against respondents. The first is that respondents knowingly submitted or caused to be submitted in behalf of their1 clients false statements of loss of earnings to insurance carriers; 11 of 22 specifications have been sustained. We conclude the evidence supports the sustained specifications, except as to the claimant Stoloff. In five cases the claimants and the alleged employers were unknown to each other. In the remaining five cases the claimants were employed as stated but the claimants did not sustain and made no claims to the respondents…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- In re LindenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930