United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Monarch Funding Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
Following a remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) renews its motion for summary judgment against the Defendant Richard O. Bertoli (“Bertoli”). Specifically, the SEC seeks reaffirmation of this Court’s Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction and Disgorgement against Bertoli. (See SEC Ex. D.) For the reasons stated below, the Plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
This Opinion represents the latest stage in the protracted litigation…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,351 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Commonwealth Chemical Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Securities Exchange Commission v. Monarch Funding Corporation, Leo M. Eisenberg, Steven R. Cloyes, and Richard M. Cannistraro, Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. PlasterDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998