Legal Opinion
State v. Gallagher
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1974No. 73-623PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. BkowN, J.
The question presented is whether testimony, concerning certain statements made by appellant to his parole officer about his involvement in a crime, was received at trial in violation of appellant’s privilege against self-incrimination, as guaranteed by Section 10, Article I of the OMo Constitution, and the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals and the brief of appellee cite cases from other jurisdictions which have considered this question. Of the cases cited, three courts held the testimony of the parole officer inadmissible because the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- George L. Smith v. B. J. Rhay, Warden of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- State v. LekasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- People v. GasteltumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MagbyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Ohio v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.