Legal Opinion
H. v. H.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 17, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
59 N.J. Super. 227 (1959)
157 A.2d 721
H., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
H., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 2, 1959.
Decided December 17, 1959.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and HANEMAN.
Mr. Paul Bartel argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Bartel and Sartoga, attorneys).
No appearance for defendant-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
This is an action for divorce by the plaintiff-husband for extreme cruelty of the defendant-wife consisting of her maintenance of an active homosexual relationship with another…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. MacFarlandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Crutcher v. CrutcherMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- Fallon v. FallonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Morrone v. MorroneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Friedman v. FriedmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- In Re LabadyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Melia v. MeliaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Richardson v. RichardsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- S.B. v. S.J.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.