Legal Opinion

Garris v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1983No. 81-397, 82-794PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Associate Judge:

This is a consolidated appeal which incorporates both a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction, and an appeal from the denial of a motion for post-trial relief. The direct appeal is presented by counsel, while appellant’s challenge to the collateral attack is made pro se. 2

After a trial by jury, appellant was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder, first-degree felony murder (robbery), first-degree felony murder (grand larceny), robbery, grand larceny [items taken from the victim’s home], grand larceny of an automobile, and unauthorized use of a vehicle. 3…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. David Isaiah Garris v. Charles S. Lindsay, Administrator, Maximum Security FacilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Catlett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API