Legal Opinion

King Athletic Goods Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 5, 1968No. C.D. 3633PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This case involves the proper classification of football bladders, in chief value of rubber, which were imported from Japan. The merchandise was classified by the collector under item 734.72, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as parts of football equipment, other, and assessed with duty at the rate of 15 percent ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 772.75 of the tariff schedules as inflatable articles, not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics, dutiable at the rate of 12y2 percent ad valorem.

Set forth below are the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Freni v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Jack Schaefer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  3. Mettler Instrument Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API