Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Street Ry. Co. v. Henkel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The petition alleges that the plaintiff, Chris Henkel, a passenger on defendant’s street car, was injured while attempting to alight therefrom, due to the sole negligence of defendant’s agents and servants acting within the scope of their authority, in that the car was caused to start without warning while plaintiff was in the act of alighting; that such agents and servants failed to use the necessary care in observing plaintiff while alighting from the street car.

The answer of defendant railway company admits that plaintiff was a passenger on its street car, and alleges that plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lima Used Car Exchange Co. v. HemperlyOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bartson v. CraigOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Scharff v. LevineOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati Street Ry Co. v. HenkelOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API