Smotkin v. Peterson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment of the superior . court of Pima County.
The facts are that during the year 1949 the Arizona State Tax Commission, hereinafter called the commission, sought to collect a sales tax from appellants under the provisions of the Arizona Excise Revenue Act of 1935, A.C.A.1939, § 73-1301 et seq., for the privilege of engaging in business as contractors in Pima County, Arizona.
The commission made demand upon appellants to pay to it the $1 license fee and to file their returns as prescribed by the Act which appellants refused to do. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cress v. SwitzerArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Brown v. NavarreArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Washington National Bank v. DailyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Nelssen v. Electrical District No. 4Arizona Supreme Court · 1943
- Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. v. BowlesArizona Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Peterson v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Estate of Bohn v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Campbell v. SUPERIOR CT, IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.