Legal Opinion

Smotkin v. Peterson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1951No. 5370PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment of the superior . court of Pima County.

The facts are that during the year 1949 the Arizona State Tax Commission, hereinafter called the commission, sought to collect a sales tax from appellants under the provisions of the Arizona Excise Revenue Act of 1935, A.C.A.1939, § 73-1301 et seq., for the privilege of engaging in business as contractors in Pima County, Arizona.

The commission made demand upon appellants to pay to it the $1 license fee and to file their returns as prescribed by the Act which appellants refused to do. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cress v. SwitzerArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Brown v. NavarreArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Washington National Bank v. DailyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Nelssen v. Electrical District No. 4Arizona Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. v. BowlesArizona Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Peterson v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Estate of Bohn v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Campbell v. SUPERIOR CT, IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API