Nelssen v. Electrical District No. 4
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
Appellant in his motion for rehearing urges that since our holding is to the effect that the electrical district tax was levied and asssessed against his land without authority of law, the decision requiring him to pay such tax as a condition to his right to question its legality is erroneous and should not be permitted to stand.
We do not undertake to restate the reasons why appellant’s lands were not subject to the electrical district taxes. The able and well-reasoned opinion of the Chief Justice who wrote it very convincingly shows that appellant’s premises were not legally within the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Smotkin v. PetersonArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Williams v. Bankers National InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- State Tax Commission v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. v. BowlesArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Lane v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.