Legal Opinion
Hewlett Packard Co. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 15, 2011No. Misc. Action No. 07-493 (RMC). MDL No. 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PAPST’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S ORDER ON HP’S MOTION TO STRIKE
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
In this Multi District Litigation (“MDL”), Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. (“Papst”) has alleged that digital camera manufacturers that sell products in the United States have infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,470,399 (“'399 Patent”) and 6,895,-449 (“'449 Patent”) (collectively the “Patents”). The Camera Manufacturers (“CMs”) seek a declaratory judgment of non-infringement and/or patent invalidity. 1
Papst filed its Final Asserted Claims and Infringement…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları T.A.Ş. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'nUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- United States v. Maverick Mktg., LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020