Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Post

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 2, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The present application by an attorney for a fixation of his fees under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act presents a triple aspect. The first concerns his right to remuneration for services in the recovery of certain stock in the possession of the executors, title to which was claimed by his client; the second, for services rendered in an action in the Municipal Court on behalf of herself and her husband; and the third, for the defeat of a counterclaim by the executors against the legatee, which was litigated in the accounting proceeding in this court.

*390The first claimed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HirschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  2. In re AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  3. In re the Estate of DuganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of HayesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  2. In re the Estate of DavisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  3. In re the Estate GurlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. In re the Estate of CombesNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API