Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Luczak v. Mariove

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 2, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On-appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Foster, whose opinion is reported in 9® N. J. Eq. 877.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee-Curiam.

■' The decree appealed- from will be-affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, ‘Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk — 12. For reversal — None.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heim & Hillbrook Acres, Inc. v. ShoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Miller v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. Bondarchuk v. BarberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  4. Feldman v. WarshawskyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  5. Koperski v. WiraNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API