Rhodes v. Lance, Inc.

By Judge D. Arthur Kelsey

The plaintiff, Elizabeth T. Rhodes, has filed a motion in limine objecting to the expert testimony proffered by the defendants.1 Contending that the expert intends to offer an accident reconstruction opinion, the plaintiff seeks a pretrial ruling declaring this testimony inadmissible in its entirety. The Court finds that die proffered testimony passes the gatekeeping tests in some respecte but not others. The plaintiff’s motion in limine, therefore, will be denied in part and granted in part.

Travelling south on Bridge Road, a divided two-lane highway, the plaintiff…