Legal Opinion

Halpin v. Frankenberger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1982No. 53,483PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.:

Plaintiff Thomas Halpin appeals from an order of the district court sustaining a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant Topeka Bank & Trust, a Kansas banking corporation (the bank). The appeal involves the rights and duties existing between a guarantor and a creditor. Summary judgment was also granted to plaintiff against the other defendant Phillip Frankenberger and no appeal has been taken by Frankenberger from that ruling.

In 1975, Halpin and Frankenberger met and decided to go into the carpet business. They formed Centennial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Brown v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Kansas State Bank & Trust Co. v. DeLoreanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  4. Blitz ex rel. Erickson v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Union Planters Nat. Bank of Memphis v. MarkowitzDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1979

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. First City Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association v. Air Capitol Aircraft Sales, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, and Gary R. Morgan, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. Haysville U.S.D. No. 261 v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Arrowhead Construction Co. v. Essex Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. McDaniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GallowayDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API