Legal Opinion

Amusing Sandwich, Inc. v. City of Palm Springs

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1985No. E000676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDANIEL, J.

The Amusing Sandwich (plaintiff) is a video game and fast food operation, which claims to be “The Only Video Arcade in Downtown Palm Springs.” The action in the trial court was brought by plaintiff against the City of Palm Springs (City), seeking an injunction to prevent the enforcement of a City interim ordinance prohibiting the installation of any video games in City’s central business district (CBD). City filed a cross-complaint, claiming that plaintiff’s violation of the ordinance was a nuisance per se and should be abated. While the action was pending, the interim…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cal. Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Outdoor Media GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Novi v. City of PacificaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. City of Monterey v. CarrnshimbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Outdoor Media GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API