Legal Opinion

United States v. National Bank of Commerce

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1985No. 83-1218PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

The United States has suggested that this appeal is moot, and the appellee National Bank of Commerce has joined in this suggestion. The total amount claimed to be owed by the taxpayer has now been paid over by the bank, thus satisfying the liability which the government has been asserting under the tax-levy statute, 26 U.S.C. § 6332(c)(1).

Any further action by this Court or by the District Court to explore the constitutional question apparently left open by the Supreme Court’s opinion, United States v. National Bank of Commerce, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2919, 2929 n. 12, 86…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Faye Anastasoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Werlein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  3. Laubinger v. Department of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  4. Martinez v. WinnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  5. Martinez v. WinnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API