Legal Opinion

Doe v. Pryor

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided August 24, 1999No. Civ.A. 99-T-730-NPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff John Doe, who proceeds in for-ma pauperis, requests in his motion for transcript that the court provide him with a transcription of the July 30, 1999, hearing on his motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons explained below, the motion is denied.

Plaintiff Doe cites 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915 in his request for the transcript. Section 1915 provides, in pertinent part, that for proceedings in forma pauperis “the court may direct payment by the United States of the expenses of (1) printing the record on appeal in any civil ... case, if such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Gold Star Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Militello v. Board of Educ. of City of Union CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wyatt Ex Rel. Rawlins v. SawyerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API