Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Keynton

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 23, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P. J.

A bill of complaint filed April 30, 1928, by appellants alleges that the defendants, appellees here, have commenced the construction of a building on property in Bayonne Subdivision of Miami, Florida, adjoining that of the complainants, in violation of a restrictive eonvenant that is contained in the muniments of the title under which defendants claim, and injunction and other appropriate relief is prayed.

The restrictive convenants contained in the muniments of title are:

“That not more than one dwelling house shall be built on any one lot, and no house shall be built for more than one family,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Stephl v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Mayes v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  4. Hall v. SnavelySupreme Court of Florida · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. v. AzamSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. McAdoo, as Trustee v. MosesSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Mercer, Et Vir v. KeyntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API