Legal Opinion

Hall v. Snavely

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 30, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The amended bill of complaint herein alleges that complainant Hall “is the owner and seized in fee simple of Lot three (3) of Block two (2) of Morrison Grove Subdivision, according to map or plat thereof as the same appears of record in Plat Book 6, page 54 of the Publie Records of Hillsborough County, Florida; that Mabel M. Snavely, the defendant herein, is the owner of Lot twelve (12) of Block two (2) of said subdivision, which lot fronts sixty (60) feet on South Fielding Avenue, running back a distance of ninety-nine (99) feet to an alley, and that your orator’s said Lot three (3) of said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tallmadge v. . the East River BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Mott v. . OppenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. King v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. Holt v. FleischmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Miles v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Wahrendorff v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Batman v. CreightonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. Mercer v. KeyntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API