Leonhart v. Stalzenberger
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 31 — SLANDER—NEW TRIAL APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Ms. Op. 1866. Dinsler v. Fresh and wife. Hilliard on New Trials, 32, 450. Civil Code, section 373. Myers’s Code, pages 489-90. 1 Burrow, 390, Bright v. Enyon. 4 Dana, 81, Hargis v. Price. 7 Dana, 329, Withers v. Butts. cited 1 Hilliard on New Trials, pages 393, 394, 395, 396, 1, 17, 21, 22. 4 Littell, 117, Bell v. Howard. 9 Dana, 136, McFarland’s adm’r v. Clark. 3 Marshall, 109, Miller v. Field. 1 Littell,…
Read the full summary
Case 31 — SLANDER—NEW TRIAL APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Ms. Op. 1866. Dinsler v. Fresh and wife. Hilliard on New Trials, 32, 450. Civil Code, section 373. Myers’s Code, pages 489-90. 1 Burrow, 390, Bright v. Enyon. 4 Dana, 81, Hargis v. Price. 7 Dana, 329, Withers v. Butts. cited 1 Hilliard on New Trials, pages 393, 394, 395, 396, 1, 17, 21, 22. 4 Littell, 117, Bell v. Howard. 9 Dana, 136, McFarland’s adm’r v. Clark. 3 Marshall, 109, Miller v. Field. 1 Littell, 39, Eccles v. Shackelford. 2 Metcalfe, 558, Letton, &c. v. Young, &c. 1 B. Monroe, 170, Hart v. Reed. 18 B. Monroe,…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson
This appeal calls for the revision of a judgment dismissing a petition for a new trial of an action of slander, in which, on the general issue, the appellees, John F. Stalzenberger and Margaret Stalzenberger, his wife, had recovered a verdict and judgment against the appellant,. George Leonhart, for one thousand five hundred dollars, for charging her in gross terms with shameless incontinence and flagrant lewdness.
The petition, filed three months after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was rendered, alleged the discovery of witnesses who would prove that, though the appellees…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McFarland's Administrators v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stone v. BaldwinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
- Marshall v. SenourCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882