Legal Opinion

McFarland's Administrators v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 27, 1839PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Assumpsit. From the Circuit Court for Franklin County.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This is is an action of assumpsit, in the name of Matilda McFarland Clark, an infant and illegitimate child, against the personal representatives of John McFarland, deceased, upon an alleged promise to her mother, Sena *135Clark, to secure and pay to the plaintiff, whenever requested by her mother, ten thousand dollars, in consideration of an agreement by the mother, to forbear proceeding against him as the putative father.

It is a general rule, that no new trial should be granted on the ground of a discovery of parol testimony relating only to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hammond v. WadhamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  2. Clarke v. McFarland's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. ComstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BickelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  3. Field v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1846
  4. Mulloy v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Leonhart v. StalzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API