Davidson v. Consolidated Quarries Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
Stone Mountain Grit Company, the plaintiff in error here, will be referred to as the plaintiff, and the defendant in error, Consolidated Quarries, as the defendant.
A very thorough review of the evidence adduced upon the trial is required by the plaintiff’s insistence on the general grounds and the defendant’s contention that the special grounds of the motion for new trial need not be considered because a verdict in its favor was demanded.
As to the plaintiff’s contention that the verdict returned in the defendant’s favor was not supported by the evidence, suffice it to say,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Emory University v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Hennessy v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Eaves & Collins v. Cherokee Iron Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Conant v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Shoup v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Considine Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. Turner Communications Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- National Health Services, Inc. v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Eddie Parker Interests, Inc. v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Sadler v. Trust Co. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- McDougal v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.