Legal Opinion

Tyrone Arnold v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2016No. ED102943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge

Introduction

Appellant Tyrone Arnold (“Arnold”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. Arnold pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to voluntary manslaughter and received a sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Arnold contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because Arnold alleged facts showing that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, in that his attorneys (collectively referred to as “plea counsel”) were ineffective for refusing to make…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Sackett v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. JEREMY W. ARATA, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Samuel Lomax v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Cork v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Brown v. FalkenrathDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
  5. CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL SHELBY v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API