Legal Opinion

Samuel Lomax v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2016No. ED103979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge

Samuel Lomax (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was charged with robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, two counts of robbery in the second degree, attempted robbery in the second degree, tampering in the first degree, assault in the third degree, resisting arrest and possession of drug paraphernalia.

According to the facts as summarized in Appellant’s direct appeal, State v. Lomax, ED97365, on the day in question, a white Chevrolet half-ton pickup truck owned by a church…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Sackett v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clemons v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  2. Jabyn Micheaux v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Jermaine Conner v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Kurtis D. Newlon v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API