Legal Opinion

Steinbergin v. Ali

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendants met their prima facie burden of demonstrating that plaintiff did not suffer a permanent right shoulder injury by submitting the affirmation of an orthopedist who found that it demonstrated a full range of motion in every plane except for one, comparing plaintiffs values to normal (see Vega v MTA Bus Co., 96 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2012]; Spencer v Golden Eagle, Inc., 82 AD3d 589, 590-591 [1st Dept 2011]). The minor diminution in a single plane was not significant enough to constitute a serious injury (see Canelo v Genolg Tr., Inc., 82 AD3d 584 [1st Dept 2011]; Sone v Qamar, 68 AD3d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dufel v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Oberly v. Bangs Ambulance, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Spencer v. Golden Eagle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Alexandre v. DweckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Quinones v. KsieniewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Santos v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Levinson v. MollahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Coley v. DeLarosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Coley v. DeLarosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Levinson v. MollahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API