Legal Opinion

City of Cheyenne v. Reiman Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1994No. 93-20PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The issue as posed by the parties is whether a construction company that has submitted a bid to a city for the construction of a fire station should be entitled to rescind its bid without penalty because of a mistake in computing the amount of the bid. The trial court, by applying Colorado law, ruled the construction company would be entitled to rescind without incurring any penalty under the circumstances of this case. We hold the trial court erred in failing to strictly apply Wyo.Stat. § 15-1-113 (1992). We affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of the contractor,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rasmussen v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Thomson v. Wyoming In-Stream Flow CommitteeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hursh Agency, Inc. v. Wigwam Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Belle Fourche Pipeline Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Platte Development Co. v. State, Environmental Quality CouncilWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. BergeronWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Arychuk v. Star Valley AssociationWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. General Chemical Corp. v. Unemployment Insurance CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API