Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Colorado

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 9, 2001No. 99-1045PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

278 F.3d 1020

Phoebe THOMPSON, Dean Ecoff, and Marcia E. Wade, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

State of COLORADO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States of America, Intervenor.

No. 99-1045.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

August 7, 2001.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc October 9, 2001.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Stephen R. Senn, Peterson & Myers, P.A., Lakeland, FL (J. Davis Connor, Peterson & Myers, P.A., Lakeland, FL; Robert Antonello, Robert G. Fegers, Antonello, Fegers & CEA, Winter Haven, FL; Glen F. Gordon,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Guttman v. KhalsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Chaffin v. Kansas State Fair BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. Ability Center of Greater Toledo v. City of SanduskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Panzardi-Santiago v. University of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
  5. Swenson v. Lincoln County School District No. 2District Court, D. Wyoming · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API